Logo

Author Archive

Head of Chipotle Restaurants Speaks Out on Immigration Issues

Waiterpay.com, citing a report in the Wall Street Journal, is reporting that after an immigration crackdown on Chipotle restaurants by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Monty Moran, the head of Chipotle restaurants, has become an advocate of immigration overhaul.

According to the article, the popular burrito restaurant chain became a high-profile target in a move against the employers of illegal workers. Over 500 undocumented workers were found to be under Chipotle’s employment and were terminated. There was resulting pressure to quickly find qualified workers to replace them — a challenge in the wake of the immigration crackdown and the increasing rate of turnover the company faced.

Chipotle views the immigrant workforce as a vital part of its success. The restaurant chain expects to hire 100,000 more workers in the upcoming three years. Other plans to expand and create more outlets are in the works. Among other reforms, Moran supports the proposal to grant legal status to workers from across the border.

For more information about restaurant employee compliance issues, contact Rick Casmass at Valiant.


Lawmakers Push to Replace TSA Screeners with Private Security

According to an article in The New York Times, lawmakers are pushing to revive a proposal that would allow the 450 or so commercial airports in the United States to use private security companies to handle passenger screening. Currently, screening is handled by Transportation Security Administration employees.

Continue Reading…


Contract Security Guard Industry Still has Room for Growth

According to an article in The Security Letter, the trend toward contracting-out in the security guard industry is growing. They report, “At an industry conference recently, some participant felt the industry was becoming ‘mature.’ They felt that business was becoming harder to obtain, exacerbated by the relentless pressure to reduce hours and cut cost.

Continue Reading…


Department of Labor Fines La Campina Mexican Grill for Restaurant Payroll Violations

The U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division has agreed to a settlement with two Mexican restaurants in Tennessee. As part of the agreement, the two La Campina Mexican Grill restaurants will pay nearly $40,000 in minimum and overtime back wages to 23 workers after DoL investigations revealed “willful and repeated violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act.” The department also assessed more than $4,000 in civil penalties against the restaurants. The Wage and Hour Division investigations revealed that the restaurants failed to record and compensate employees for all hours of their work, in violation of the FLSA’s minimum wage, overtime and record-keeping provisions.

Investigators conducted employee interviews and reviewed payroll documents, leading them to conclude that restaurant workers were often made to work more than 40 hours per week without receiving overtime compensation. Also, workers were paid a flat salary that did not result in them earning at least the minimum wage of $7.25 for all the hours they worked. Investigators also determined that La Campina “created and maintained inaccurate records of its employees’ work hours, rates of pay, and wages actually paid.”

La Campina owner Ricardo Sanchez has agreed to comply with the FLSA going forward and will implement new business procedures to accurately record and compensate employees for all hours worked, in accordance with the law.

The FLSA requires that covered, nonexempt employees be paid at least the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour for all hours worked, plus time and one-half their regular rates of pay, including commissions, bonuses and incentive pay, for hours worked beyond 40 per week. Employers are required to keep accurate records of all hours worked by covered employees. The FLSA permits an employer to take a tip credit toward its minimum wage obligation for tipped employees that is equal to the difference between the required cash wage, which must be at least $2.13 per hour ($5.00 in New York), and the federal minimum wage. Employers may create a tip-pooling or sharing arrangement among employees who customarily and regularly receive tips, but a valid tip pool may not include employees who do not customarily and regularly receive tips, such as dishwashers, cooks, chefs and janitors.


Restaurant Payroll Trial Will Decide Whether Fresco by Scotto Had Illegal Tip Distribution Practices

According to waiterpay.com, Fresco by Scotto Restaurant will face trial on the issue of whether floor captains, stockers, and expediters improperly participated in the tip pool at the restaurant.

The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) states that the pooling of tips among employees who are “engaged in an occupation in which they customarily and regularly receive more than $30 a month in tips” is permissible.

Continue Reading…


Read This Before You Generate Another Payroll in Connecticut

Connecticut has become the first state in the nation to mandate paid sick leave exclusively for service workers such as waiters, cashiers, and hairstylists.


Continue Reading…


New Lawsuit Filed Against Le Bernardin

Sued for Tip, Overtime, and Spread of Hours Violations

Servers at Le Bernardin, Zagat’s top-rated New York seafood restaurant for 2011, have sued the restaurant for tip, overtime, and spread of hours violations. The Complaint, filed in United States District Court in Manhattan by attorneys for a former captain and server at the restaurant, alleges that the waitstaff was required to pool their tips with managers who exercised significant managerial control over the waitstaff at Le Bernardin.

The servers were also required to share tips with other non-service/managerial individuals, including Le Bernardin’s wine director and another individual who worked in the kitchen and prepared coffee. The Complaint also alleges that Le Bernardin charged mandatory gratuities at private events but instead of distributing these gratuities in their entirety to the waitstaff, the restaurant retained a significant percentage of the gratuities and/or used it to pay the event coordinator.

In addition, attorneys for the waiters, claim that the waitstaff’s workdays often lasted longer than ten hours but that the restaurant did not pay New York’s “spread of hours” premium to its employees. The “spread of hours” premium under New York law is equal to one hour’s pay at the minimum wage for each such workday.


Avoid Penalties—and an Audit—for Misclassified Employees

When you generate your payroll, you have two primary classifications of workers: employees and independent contractors. But who fits into which category? And if you misclassify someone, how can you avoid sanctions?

Thanks to a new program from the IRS, it is now easier to properly classify all of your employees and independent contractors.

According to an article by economic and statistical consultant Stephanie R. Thomas, the misclassification of employees is at the top of the Department of Labor’s agenda for 2012. The Agency, she says, has promised to redouble its efforts to combat worker misclassification, and is in the process of signing a Memorandum of Understanding with the IRS. Under the agreement, the agencies would work together and share information to reduce misclassification of employees, reduce the tax gap, and to improve compliance with federal labor laws.

But, Thomas writes, the two agencies seem to be taking different approaches to remedying misclassification. While the DOL is focusing on increased enforcement and audit activities, the IRS is taking a proactive approach with its new Voluntary Classification Settlement Program. The VCSP is part of the larger “Fresh Start” Initiative from the IRS aimed at giving businesses and individuals a fresh start with their tax obligations.

The program allows those employers who are concerned that they have misclassified employees in the past to voluntarily come forward, rather than wait for an IRS examination.

If you think you may have misclassified employees as independent contractors, the VCSP offers some significant advantages. Companies can reclassify individuals as employees for future tax periods and only pay 10 percent of the employment tax liability as a result of the reclassification for the most recent tax year. There are no penalties or interest on the employment tax liability. The IRS also agrees not to audit the employer on the classification of these workers for prior years.

In exchange for this deal, employers agree to extend the limitations period for assessment of employment taxes for an additional three years for the first three years after reclassification. This means that rather than the standard three-year look-back window, the IRS now has a six-year window to go back and review your tax returns to see if additional tax monies are owed.

In order to take advantage of the VCSP, employers have to apply to the program by completing Form 8952, Application for Voluntary Classification Settlement Program, at least 60 days before they want to begin treating the workers as employees. Employers also have to satisfy some basic eligibility criteria:

It’s important to be aware that the IRS is not obligated to accept your application and allow participation in the VCSP. So what happens if your application is rejected by the IRS? Because this program is so new, there’s not a lot of real-world experience yet. But the IRS has stated that rejection of the employer’s application will not automatically trigger an investigation, and employers can re-apply to the program in the future.

Thomas concludes, “If you think you have misclassified employees in the past, the Voluntary Classification Settlement Program may be a great way to proactively address the issue, rather than waiting for an IRS investigation, and save some money in the process. But before signing up, think about what reclassification may mean beyond your federal tax liability. There are implications for payroll, employer-sponsored benefits programs, unemployment and workers compensation insurance, etc. – not to mention the possibility of penalties from the DOL and state agencies.”

Tax liabilities, penalties and other implications aside, properly classifying your employees is essential. If you have improperly classified individuals as independent contractors, correct that mistake now and start the New Year off on the right foot.

If you’d like more information about employee classification, contact Jeff DiDomenico at Valiant.


Avoid Penalties—and an Audit—for Misclassified Employees

When you generate your payroll, you have two primary classifications of workers: employees and independent contractors. But who fits into which category? And if you misclassify someone, how can you avoid sanctions?

Thanks to a new program from the IRS, it is now easier to properly classify all of your employees and independent contractors.


Continue Reading…


Benihana’s Haru Restaurants in New York Served with Overtime and Spread of Hours Lawsuit

According to a report on waiterpay.com, waiters at six Haru restaurants owned by Benihana, Inc., claim that they were not paid an overtime premium or the “spread of hours” pay required under the law.

Waiterpay goes on to say the complaint was filed in the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York. The Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law require overtime pay of time and one-half after forty hours worked in a week. New York Labor Law also requires that restaurant workers receive an extra hour of minimum wage pay on days in which their “spread of hours” exceeds ten hours. Attorneys for the workers seek back wages, liquidated damages, and other remedies for the servers.

For more information about overtime and spread of hours compliance, contact Jeff DiDomenico